Society of American Foresters
Members Only
About Forestry
About SAF
Career Center
Certified Forester
Education
Meetings
Publications
Policy and Press
Shop The SAF Store
Shop The SAF Store
Working Groups
SAF Home Page


Join / Renew
Contact Us

Initial Effects of Prescribed Fire on Quality of Soil Solution and Streamwater in the Southern Appalachian Mountains

Authors: Elliott Katherine J.1; Vose James M.2

Source: Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Volume 29, Number 1, February 2005 , pp. 5-15(11)

Abstract:

Prescribed burning is being used in the Conasauga River Watershed in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia by National Forest managers to restore degraded pine/oak communities. The purpose of these burns is to restore shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Miller)/mixed-oak forests with more diverse understories, which include native bluestem grasses (Andropogon gyrans Ashe and Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash). Although burning might be an effective tool for restoring these stands to a shortleaf pine/mixed-oak/bluestem grass community type, it is not known whether these restoration burns will have a negative impact on water quality. Six subwatersheds (similar in vegetation, soil type, stream size and location, and disturbance history) were located within the Conasauga River Watershed. Four of the sites were burned in Mar. 2001, and two sites were designated as controls. To evaluate initial effects of prescribed burning on water quality, we measured soil solution and streamwater nutrient concentrations and streamwater sediment concentration (TSS; total suspended solids) weekly over a 10-month period. Consistent with goals of the land managers, all the prescribed fires resulted in low- to moderate-intensity and low-severity fires. Soil solution and streamwater NO3--N and NH4+-N did not increase after burning on any of the sites. We found no differences in TSS between burn and control streams in any of the sample periods. In addition, we found no detectable differences between control and burned sites for concentrations of PO43-, SO42-, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, or pH in soil solution or streamwater. Thus, these prescribed restoration fires did not have a significant effect on soil solution and stream chemistry or stream sediment (TSS) concentrations. Our results suggest that low-intensity, low-severity fires, such as those in this study, could be used as a tool to restore vegetation structure and composition in these mixed pine-hardwood ecosystems without negatively impacting water quality. South. J. Appl. For. 29(1):5–15.

Keywords: Nitrate-nitrogen; sediment; disturbance; restoration; shortleaf pine ecosystems; environmental management; forest; forest management; forest resources; forestry; forestry research; forestry science; natural resources; natural resource management

Document Type: Regular article

Affiliations: 1: Southern Research Station, Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory USDA Forest Service 3160 Coweeta Lab Road Otto NC 28763 Phone: (828) 524-2128;, Fax: (828) 369-6768, Email: kelliott@fs.fed.us 2: Southern Research Station, Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory USDA Forest Service 3160 Coweeta Lab Road Otto NC 28763

* This feature is in beta and some links may initially be displayed as numbers instead of article titles. Clicking on any of the links will take you to the recommended articles, regardless of the display of the link.

Article Access Options

The requested document is freely available to subscribers. Users without a subscription can purchase this article.

Sign in

Purchase PDF Download

Purchase Printed Copy

Back to top


Society of American Foresters
5400 Grosvenor Lane, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-2198
P: 301.897.8720   -   Toll Free: 866.897.8720   -   F: 301.897.3690
Email: safweb@safnet.org

Copyright © 2006 - Society of American Foresters